Cloud adoption is increasing at a rapid pace. The eG Innovations & DevOps Institute APM survey indicates that 88% of organizations are using at least one form of cloud technology. Organizations move to the cloud for agility – they can deploy and have applications running in the cloud in minutes. Cloud computing also offers options for high availability, automated backups, and such. When applications are migrated to the cloud, it isn’t the cloud service provider’s (CSP’s) responsibility to monitor the application service and the cloud provider’s built-in monitoring tools are unlikely to be sufficient. In our new eBook, we’ve covered the limitations of CSP SLAs and native monitoring tooling that will help you understand the gaps and what you need to do to proactively monitor and troubleshoot application uptime and services.

Another unsaid aspect of SLAs is that they are measured by the service provider, using their tools and mechanisms.

Debunk the Top Myths of Cloud Performance Monitoring

By now, you’ve probably understood that just moving to the cloud doesn’t mean that the performance of your applications is guaranteed. This and other common myths of cloud performance monitoring are covered in our white paper “Top 6 Myths of Cloud Performance Monitoring”.

We’ve also addressed the complexity of setting up, assessing the licensing cost, and the limitations of native cloud monitoring tools like Azure Monitor and Amazon CloudWatch in our earlier blog posts.

The white paper also provides a detailed comparison of CloudWatch’s capabilities with a specialized monitoring solution like eG Enterprise.